The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports center now, and how tit will look after redevelopment.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given two plans illustrate the present University Sports Center layout in the first plan and the proposed improvements in the second plan.
Overall, the entrance, reception and the 25m pool in the center stays the same, following the seating to the right of the pool and changing room to the left of the pool. The gym will be extended to the east and it will double the space. Apart from that, two new dance studios will build to the far east corner, following a second changing room and a café next to it in south east corner. Also, new sports hall will be taking over the space of the outdoor courts in east side next to the seating. To the west side of the layout current space occupied by the outdoor courts will be demolished and there will be a Leisure pool instead. Furthermore, In the south west corner, there will be the third changing room and a sports shop next to it.
In summary we can see the proposed plan have more features and giving more space to the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will double the space. Apart from that, two new dance studios will build to the ...
^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...t to it in south east corner. Also, new sports hall will be taking over the space of t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and giving more space to the students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, second, so, third, apart from, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45856353591 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21191900765 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475138121547 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2247397907 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143737423032 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708251266495 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524880490089 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113869178769 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620306393261 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.