Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a group rather than individually.
Do you agree or disagree?
Interactive approaches, especially in terms of education, have increased in popularity during the recent years. Although self-study has yet its own defenders, from my standpoint, learning in group would be more fruitful.
In earlier times, pupils were more inclined to study individually. This approach benefited them from better concentration. Indeed, it provided a tranquil atmosphere, where there was no compulsory to follow strict circumstances, and also no distribution to draw their attention. A paradigm shift, however, has happened in public’s understanding. Nowadays, there is an upward trend in learning through collaboration due to its much more positive sides.
First of all, participating in a team teaches students how to communicate with their peers. Thanks to speaking, discussion, and consulting, they would find the opportunity to revolutionize their social skills, an ability which plays a pivot role in their future career path. One the other hand, sharing knowledge would happen in a faster pace in this situation, which eventually broadens the members’ knowledge of various aspects of a subject. For instance, in terms of presenting an architectural project, one is specialized to work with design software, and another one is expert in artistic aspects of the project. These two can work together, learn from each other and eventually enhance their knowledge.
Having said that, knowledge can be acquired through both self-study and teamwork. Nonetheless, in my opinion, getting involved in groups would result in more achievements.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71063829787 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23503904021 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.672340425532 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0637259858 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591392082053 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213789058401 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025806715502 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388288412657 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188054660023 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.