Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a group rather than individually.
Do you agree or disagree?
Learning by participating in a group have increased in popularity during the recent years. The majority of people takes a positive approach to this alteration, while self-study has yet its own defenders. From my standpoint, the upsides of learning in groups is far more considerable than studying alone.
Some people, especially introverts, are more inclined to study individually. This approach benefits them from better concentration. Indeed, it provides a tranquil atmosphere, where there is no compulsion to follow strict circumstances, and also no disturbance leading to confusion. In stark contrast, the majority of society prefer to learn by contributing to interactive activities. In their opinion, there are an array of advantages in collaboration due to its special features.
First of all, participating in a team demonstrates how to communicate. By expressing their own visions, discussion, and consulting, learners would find the opportunity to revolutionize their social skills -an ability which plays a pivot role in social life. One the other hand, sharing knowledge would happen in a faster pace in this situation, which eventually broadens the members’ knowledge of various aspects of a subject. For instance, in terms of presenting an architectural project, one is specialized to work with design software, and the other one is expert in artistic aspects of the project. These two individuals can work together, learn from each other and eventually enhance their knowledge.
Having said that, knowledge can be acquired through both self-study and teamwork. Nonetheless, in my opinion, getting involved in groups would result in more achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 415, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'arrays'?
Suggestion: arrays
...ivities. In their opinion, there are an array of advantages in collaboration due to i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62450592885 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30592185972 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6067334343 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968251643706 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335107466905 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391448799467 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623177712533 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512498585744 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.