Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the recent decades, cities, especially metropolises, have faced more pollution than ever before. As a result, a controversy has arisen over what is the primary reason behind this predicament. While some people attribute it to the marked increase of cars, others would contend that the chief among all causes is industrial activities, which from my perspective, the latter is more accurate. Although cars, undoubtedly, cause a detrimental effect on urban environment, the catastrophe industrialism brings in its wake is much more disturbing.
Emitting harmful gases to air, cars have always been considered as a danger to cities. The gravity of this problem, nonetheless, has been alleviated thanks to significant alterations. Electric cars are going to publicity as a substitute for conventional pollutant cars. Government, furthermore, is determined to take an environmentally friendly approach by allocating more expenditure to public transportation which culminate in a decline in number of cars. Hence, the side effects of overusing cars are going to be marginal in the foreseeable future.
In stark contrast, never have been urban districts experienced such industrial growth in the history. Modern lifestyle which consumerism play a major role in, leads to a marked boost in the construction of factories, with the aim of providing a wide range of multicolored products for consumer society. Having occupied the suburbs, factories are likely to encroach into the heart of cities in the future. If it happens, cities’ degradation will occur. Unfortunately, not only does this damage ruins cities, but it also bring long-term consequences to ecosystem in the shape of global warming and extinction of species.
By way of conclusion, both cars and factories are culprit for cities’ pollution. Industrial issue, however, is the pivot in which the catastrophe turns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of factories, with the aim of providing a wide range of multicolored products fo...
^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...s this damage ruins cities, but it also bring long-term consequences to ecosystem in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57638888889 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25313684089 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8965804146 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145268393892 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043061903681 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423344358689 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907366629868 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411501584838 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.