The maps below show the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007.
?Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. (The photo is in the next post.)
Given are two maps illustrating the transformation of the town of Lynnfield from 1936 to 2007. According to the pictures, the city had witnessed a considerable development of residential area at the vicinity of the river. Core of the city, however, had kept its original shape with some few changes.
Looking the map in more details, it can be seen that a civilization had shaped near the river which was a vacant land before. There is also an increase in the number of trees in the north west of the city. Moreover, the primary cycle path gave its place to a new road. Although the government office and farmland did not demolish, they converted to a museum and golf course, respectively.
The city had a rectangular central area with four intersections which can also be seen in 2007 map. Post office, Bank, and library stayed in their previous location with no alteration. Nonetheless, a supermarket had been constructed by merging previous sweet shop and butchers, and a shopping market had fielded the empty center of the core.
In overall, the growth of the residential area near the river can be mentioned as the most striking change of the town. Moreover. Some constructions, Government office for instance, converted to use for another function, while some others (such as library) had not changed during this approximately 70-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...s the most striking change of the town. Moreover. Some constructions, Government office ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98230088496 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91119507731 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3537437512 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696975575688 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299272151737 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570823758946 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443682271757 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337091926061 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.