The graph below shows the average of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide that each person in four countries, united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal produced from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is noticeable that italian and Portugal people's average carbon dioxide emissions rose gradually in these 40 years, whereas those of united kingdom and Sweden decreased, especially there was a sudden decline in the number of co2 production by people in Sweden since 1977.
As can be seen obviously, the quantity of co2 wastes of Portugal increased significantly from under 2 metric tonnes (mt) to nearly 6 mt in the first 30 years, which then kept instant at about above 5 mt until 2007. In the same manner, italian's average carbon dioxide production, which was 2 mt more than Portugal people's, went up suddenly from more than 4 mt in the initial year to over 6 mt 10 years later, then slowed the speeding of development of co2 emissions before stopping rising in 1997, at the approximate of 8 mt.
Conversely, although Sweden rose in the number of average co2 wastes per person from 1967 to 1977, it then dropped significantly from 10 mt to under 6 mt in 2007, which was nearly 5 mt less than it used to in the first year. In comparison to the previous country, united kingdom declined slightly without any changes for the rest of the years, at about 11 mt back to nearly 9 mt 40 years later.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66115702479 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59529134975 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54958677686 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1130503873 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.0 112.824112599 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.3333333333 22.9334400587 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188227148426 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121441617685 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864234941047 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159137161819 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837750503981 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.64 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.