Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a group rather than individually.
Do you agree or disagree?
Large number of people consider that group learning is better than the alone. In my opinion, group learning is much better then individual learning, because it requires lost of understanding potential, patience until and unless you are native book reader.
First of all, reading needs a composure. Some people, especially introverts, inclined to study individually. This approach benefits them for better concentration. Indeed, it provides a at peace atmosphere, where there is no compulsion and no disturbance which leads to confusion. Where as, if you sits with group of people you can discuss with them if you are not able to analyse. Moreover, Nowadays people are more intend to see the videos rather than reading books for information and knowledge, Which weaken the capability of reading as well as interest over reading books.
Secondly, Participating in groups teaches how to communicate with other. By expressing their own visions, discussing with other will enhance the social skills for learners. On the other hand, we shares the knowledge with other in various aspects.
For example, if we consider any project it requires lot of teamwork. We need development team who develops the initial project, Integration team to unite the developed code and testing team who can validate the functioning of the application. These individuals can work together, learn from each other and enhance their knowledge.
To be concluded, knowledge can be acquired either by group or individual. nevertheless, in my opinion, getting involved in groups would improve results in individual as well as team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
.... In my opinion, group learning is much better then individual learning, because it require...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires lost" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'lost' or 'to be lost'.
Suggestion: lost; to be lost
...ndividual learning, because it requires lost of understanding potential, patience un...
^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tter concentration. Indeed, it provides a at peace atmosphere, where there is no ...
^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...o disturbance which leads to confusion. Where as, if you sits with group of people you c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'sit'
Suggestion: sit
...ch leads to confusion. Where as, if you sits with group of people you can discuss wi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'share'
Suggestion: share
...lls for learners. On the other hand, we shares the knowledge with other in various asp...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...acquired either by group or individual. nevertheless, in my opinion, getting involved in gro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39682539683 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91773277136 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3253243079 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194653386516 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600037369155 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769257680094 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102629309706 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929796174017 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.