The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons relevant.
Given are two maps illustration the alteration of a public garden when it opened and today. According to the plans, it can be said that the overall size and shape of the area haven’t changed during approximately a century, while recreational facilities have seen a huge development.
In 1920, a fountain was located at the heart of the park. These days, nonetheless, it gives its place to a square-shaped garden which is surrounded by four seats coming from other parts of the park. Two entrances have been located on the northern and southern of the park providing access to Arnold and Eldon streets since the construction of the place. A third entrance for cars has been added in the lower level. At the first, there were three rose gardens and a stage to the east, but now the stages is replaced by an amphitheater, one of the rose gardens gives its place to a café, and the other one is demolished. A play area and a water feature are in the vicinity of the café rather than the previous pond and glass house.
Overall. It can be said that although the shape and size of the park have remained intact, the function of recreational equipment has changed significantly during the period mentioned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76886792453 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76929378616 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580188679245 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1545661034 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116150566217 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526146684983 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549356352044 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716711677853 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144200471672 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.