The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two layouts represent the access of road to a city hospital from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, it can be clear the place of car parking for public and staff members had separated and two roundabout made in the north and south direction of hospital road. The city hospital remained at same place. In addition to, the latest bus stand had established.
Looking at the first map for 2007 in more detail, there was a city hospital, which was surrounded by ring road. On the south side of city hospital, right and left side of hospital road there were three bus stops on each side. On the right side of hospital road car park area for public and staff. There was a city road on the south east.
Turning to second map for 2010, city hospital remained unchanged over a period. The area of car parking had apart, the parking for staff remained at same location and for public situated at the right side of the city hospital. All bus stops had dismantled. On the north and south directions of hospital road, two roundabout constructed on each direction, one roundabout was in ring road and second one was in city road. A new bus station set up on the left side of the hospital road.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47441860465 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31165130305 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427906976744 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1569255928 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214551318455 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101545190213 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837436551372 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188298556808 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091167905884 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.41 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.