The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the layout of a route accessing to a
City hospital as it was in 2007 and how the same area looked
in 2010 after having been developed.
In general, the area underwent drastic changes in facilities
and transport systems. The most significant differences
could be seen in the removal of a bus station and the
construction of two roundabouts and another car park.
At the original junction between Ring Road and Hospital
Road, a new roundabout was built in 2010. At the end of the
road, people could reach the crossroad with City Road in
2007 where another roundabout was erected in 2010.
In 2007, there were six bus stops on Hospital Road, and
three ones were located on each side. However, these bus
stops were removed to pave the way for a bus station to the
left, which led to the aforementioned roundabouts.
In 2007, a car park for both staff and the public stretched
along the eastern side of Hospital Road, giving an access to
the hospital. In the next 3 years, this only served staff
members and a new car park for public use was constructed
to the east of the hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 49, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...e eastern side of Hospital Road, giving an access to the hospital. In the next 3 years, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73737373737 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.573260822 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6784008469 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 20.0 3.83414634146 522% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189573210264 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805725749746 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697030165658 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542448554631 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579804015079 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.