Some people thinks scientific research should focus on solving world health problems. Others think that there are more important issues. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions Are divided onto whether solving world health issues or other crucial problems should be tackled. From my perspective, solving global health problems can bring distinct benefits for certain situations, but other important problems should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, those who argue that addressing world health problems may have convincing reasons, associated with affecting people’s well-being immediately and on a wide scale. When it comes to health issues, people are the victims of a threat to dangerous diseases along with the advent on a large scale. For example, in 2019, millions of citizens in the world have been suffering from the impact of Covid19 leads to millions of death cases being recorded. However, scientific research has found that vaccine which prevents the growth of virus threat to human life.
Moreover, apart from the serious elements of the Covid-19 pandemic, other culprits can be global warming, pollution and human survival, so better solutions can be adopted to alleviate such problems. with regard to the former, global warming or pollution can annihilate all the people in the world. For example, a tsunami in Japan in 2002 was a result of environmental damage making thousands of Japanese citizens dead. As far as the latter is concerned, the sources of food and water for human survival are crucial, without scientific advancements to ensure food security citizens can face the challenges of a lack of food or water. For instance, Vietnamese people suffered from famine for a long time, in 1945, which was obsessed with all the inhabitants during that time.
In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that although solving worldwide problems have some positive effects, scientific research on other crucial issues should not be underestimated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
... be adopted to alleviate such problems. with regard to the former, global warming or...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll the people in the world. For example, a tsunami in Japan in 2002 was a result ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35664335664 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76524577299 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9085769917 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218946564446 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878996082824 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881107957957 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166005256735 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920600862357 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.