The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant
The two figures below illustrates how to get to the City hospital in two respective years, 2007 and 2010.
Generally, a significant change can be obviously observed in the way which access to the hospital in three-year time compared to 2007
Specifically, the intersection of the Hospital Road in 2007 was three years later, turned in to a large roundabout in order to regulate the traffic. Also, another roundabout was constructed at the end of Hospital Road, right beside the car park gate on Ring Road. Both of the roundabouts were connected to the enormous bus station that was built at the west of Hospital Road in replacement of the six bus stops that were formerly located alongside of the road. Another difference which can be derived from the given figure was the relocation of the public car park of the hospital. While the public car park was shifted to the east side of the hospital, the staff car park still remained to order to provide more parking space for the hospital's workforce.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'providing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: providing
... staff car park still remained to order to provide more parking space for the hospitals wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 736, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hospitals'' or 'hospital's'?
Suggestion: hospitals'; hospital's
...r to provide more parking space for the hospitals workforce.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80346820809 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68350072048 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7820303378 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169434031402 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094206987474 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086225714161 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148745147001 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816793217117 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.