The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010.
The given table depicts the revenue of the export of 5 different types of products in two separate years 1997 and 2010.
Generally, the total export value experienced a rise over 13 years. While there were increases seen in the money collected from exporting Equipment, Telecommunity and Metals, the opposite trend was witnessed in those of Clothing and Manufacturing products.
As shown in the provided table, $10.3 billion was collected from shipping equipment overseas in 1997. This figure experienced a growth to $11.6 billion in 2010, which was equivalent to 113% of the former value. A similar trend was seen in the figure for Telecommunity where it reached 12.7 in 2010 compared to 7.9 in 1997. Also, a dramatic increase of 122% was witnessed in the revenue of sending metals abroad, hitting $5.1 billion in 2010; it was twice as much as that in 1997.
In contrast, less money was earned from the transportation of Clothing and Manufacturing goods abroad. Both figures fell slightly by 17% and 27% of the 1997’s value respectively, bottoming at $5 billion for the former and $4 for the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1997’s value respectively, bottoming at billion for the former and for the latt...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...997’s value respectively, bottoming at billion for the former and for the latter.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bottoming at billion for the former and for the latter.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0218579235 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82983089718 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0939552871 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151677114877 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068924681859 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734531988805 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112818887589 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828159044843 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.