The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages?
As online social networking channels become more prevalent and attract many internet users, they have superseded the conventional way of interaction between people. However, I consider using social media as a way of communication to more advantageous compared to making direct conversations.
Social networking sites make our communication so simple and convenient that it is believed by advocates to make us closer. Online audio calls, text messaging and even the recent advent of video calls have successfully made interactions between people happen more often regardless of how distant they are, their ages or personal backgrounds. Thus, users often use sites such as Facebook to get in touch with their relatives or friends who live far away from them. New friend can also be made via such sites and some people even treat them as a way to look for their life partners.
Furthermore, thanks to its convenience, online interaction is also used in formal situations. For instance, in group work or meetings, arranging appointments and getting to the meeting venue is considered time-consuming. This is why nowadays they are often carried out through video calls. Not only does it save time, but it also allows group members to collect information even if they are at home. Besides, companies often treat the media as a means to deliver their products information in every single of their consumers.
To sum up, since the advent of the social media, interactions occur more frequent and information is brought to people faster than before. Hence, I strongly believed that the pros of it completely outnumbered the cons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2213740458 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92000448612 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637404580153 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0248106483 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136430813367 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473167565184 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530901461656 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09241296813 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510203133175 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.