Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Language barrier is considered to be one of the prevalent issues that poses anxiousness to many immigrants. Although I admit that this potentially results in significant social problems, with the help of technology, little do those without foreign language face practical ones.
Without the acquisition of the language of the country an immigrant is living, encountering social implications is known to be inevitable. First and foremost, this makes immigrants become incompetent of communicating which results in involving in conversations with locals nearly impossible. As a result, these people often find looking for more acquaintances and broadening their relationship a challenge. Besides, not knowing a language is probable to the misunderstanding between the locals and the foreigner which perhaps, consequently triggers conflicts between both parties. Furthermore, discrimination is another typical issue that may occur to immigrants who do not speak the regional language.
On the other hand, immigrants can still have a convenient life despite a significant number of obstacles an immigrant who does not speak the local language faces. It is mainly because practical problems can be minimised with the help of technology. Its powerful features allow foreigners to obtain access to their necessities without engaging in any verbal interactions. To illustrate, they can still look up for directions from one place to another with the help of the electronic map displayed on the screens of their phones. Also, with the help of translating apps that can be easily downloaded conversations can be conveyed effectively via texts as translations can be made in between. Besides, purchasing goods is not a big trouble for foreigners as orders can be placed online which does not require any language skills to do so.
In summary, even with the presence of technology, immigrants still, cannot run away from unanticipated problems regarding language difference. Hence, I believe that the most effective way to migrate to another nation is to acquire their language before living there.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, regarding, so, still, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55625 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18686268138 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5288039297 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217732175324 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726740375709 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480495378075 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132292056752 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264061049594 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.