The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages?
With the advent of technological advances and the Internet, internet-based conversations through social media have been increasing its prevalence in society, which leads to the substitution of face-to-face interactions. From my perspective, the benefits of this trend far surpass the downsides.
To begin with, harnessing online platforms in daily conversations might bring about a plethora of advantages to users. First and foremost, one of the most obvious benefits is to help users steer clear of squandering time on commuting. This is because users can keep in touch with each other through Facebook, Twitter and Whatsapp without heading out outside, which, in turn, saves a large amount of time for people. Furthermore, what online conversations might benefit the public is to permit users to connect with other distantly. Take overseas students as a prime example, online platforms have entitled those students to maintain their relationship with their bosom buddies and relatives from a thousand miles, which minimizes the prospects of homesick.
Nonetheless, online conversations might trigger some unanticipated problems. Firstly, it is mighty that distant conversations through online platforms could reduce the efficiency of the conversations. This is because an unstable internet connection is likely to occur at times, which could disrupt the conversations and result in conversation’s effectiveness. In tandem with this, body languages might be faded away as time goes by if people remain social media interactions. For instance, the importance of hand gestures might be downplayed by an array of people since online social media users could see other faces solely. As a result, people might see it is unnecessary to take advantage of body languages when it comes to an online conversation.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that conversations through social media are gaining its prevalance in modern society in light of the breakthroughs in cutting-edge devices and the Internet. Although the drawbacks of this tendency might not be overlooked, it is my firm conviction that the plus points surpass its minus ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nonetheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56748466258 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20620241102 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567484662577 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.015855729 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120059471417 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416897440997 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541803861881 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800516308702 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426549442901 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.