The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps display road lead to a city hosptal in 2007 and 2010. Overall, some changes were made in order to improve local resident’s life. Firstly, the car park was used for both staff and public in the past. After 3 years, the former parking space was extended and additional car pach was constructed in order to demand the ever-increasing population. The staff car park was placed in the old space, while the public one was the new space on the east-side of the hospital. Secondly, two roundabouts were added so that there would be less accidents. Both around-turns were in Hospital Road and accessed to the new bus station. Finally, the six old bus stops were demolished to make way for parking space and new bus station. This new station was convenient for both bus-waiters and people on road that it brought more comfortable space for waiting and less traffic jams.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...space on the east-side of the hospital. Secondly, two roundabouts were added so ...
^^^
Line 1, column 541, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...bouts were added so that there would be less accidents. Both around-turns were in Ho...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72549019608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6002395418 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9184075631 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3333333333 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968103952228 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056723635589 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931818254632 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968103952228 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.