The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The two maps illustrate how the road leading to the city hospital was transformed during the period of three years from 2007 to 2010.
In 2007, the hospital road was straight after intersection, going to the north, which has bus stops on both sides. In the following 3 years road was developed to complex ramification system, what possibly reduced the traffic jams on the way to hospital.
First of all, car park underwent some changes: it was expanded, and public car parking was located in the eastern of hospital, driving the ring road. The stuff parking remained on the same position: the first exit from the second roundabout and turn right to the parking lot. All these transformations provide more spare place for drivers. As can be seen from the map after modernization, two roundabouts now is centering the Hospital rod both sides , what provide precious opportunities to disperse the road flow especially in rush hour.
In addition, six bus stops made way for united bus station, locating just after city road crossed with first roundabout, on the west of Hospital road. It, in turn, facilitated the way to citizens find the right bus. The developers transform the Hospital access infrastructure significantly, chopping down the traffic jams and revitalizing the work of public transportation system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01376146789 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7751232067 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8468610066 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176043960159 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709873609447 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722066171345 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126787807543 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639912426267 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.