The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following maps provide some information about various changes that occurred in road access to a city hospital between two different years of 2007 and 2010.
As can be clearly observed from the maps, the road access witnessed miscellaneous developments, the most significant of which took place in at two ends of Hospital road where a pair of roundabouts were constructed. The first roundabout was located in the conjunction of City road and Hospital road and the second one was added at the entrance of Ring road from Hospital road.
Moreover, Car park for staff and public at the east of Hospital road was moved to the eastern part of Ring road as a public car park. In addition, while there were six distinctive bus stops along two sides of Hospital road in 2007, they were converted to a single Bus station at the west of Hospital road in 2010.
It is clear from the maps that a distinctive car park facility was provided for staff at the same site of the old car park at the east of Hospital road between Ring road and City road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Car) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...oad from Hospital road. Moreover, Car park for staff and public at the east of Hos...
^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...ition, while there were six distinctive bus stops along two sides of Hospital road ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57754010695 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53375507531 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.1313217586 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 142.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265006159316 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162368178923 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703545957424 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195707147739 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066640317092 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.