the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following pie charts illustrate how the yearly expenditure of a specific UK school changed in the three different years of 1981, 1991, and 2001.
As can be clearly observed from the pie charts, the trends of changes can be divided into two main groups: downward and upward. There was a dramatic increase in Insurance from 2% at 1981 to 8% at 2001. Despite the fact that both Teachers’ salaries and Furniture and equipment experienced a slow climb at the final year which was 2001, from 40% to 45% and from 15% to 23% respectively, Furniture and equipment declined dramatically at 1991 to 5% while Teachers’ salaries went up significantly and reached 50% at 1991.
on the other hand, changing pattern of Other workers’ salaries and Resources was downward. The former witnessed a remarkable decline from 28% at 1981 to 15% at 2001. Unlike a slow decrease which was occurred in the latter from 15% to 20% during 1981 to 1991, the share of Resources in the school spending went down sharply and touched 9% at 2001.
It is clear from the pie charts that as far as the proportion of Teachers’ salaries at all three years was the most significant one, the smallest share of annul spending in the school belonged to Insurance at the same years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...significantly and reached 50% at 1991. on the other hand, changing pattern of Oth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74311926606 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69757534052 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3107023043 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177872506378 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962874933432 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714474288884 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144319338075 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735679311335 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.