The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following diagram illustrates miscellaneous steps of producing electricity from geothermal energy.
As can be clearly observed from the diagram, cultivation of electricity from under-sea hot rocks consists of many different phases. The first step is about pumping low-temperature water down through a 4.5 km pipe. The injection well is located at the end of the pipe. Second, cold water is injected into an area which is called Geothermal zone using the injection well. By passing amongst hot rocks of Geothermal zone, temperature of water is risen and hot water reaches the production well.
The third phase includes pumping hot water up by means of production well with collecting in Condenser. Next at the fourth step, steam is concentrated in the Condenser. The fifth phase consists of a container. While the turbine in the container is rotated by steam power, Generator produces electricity. Finally, the produced electrical energy will be distributed.
It is clear from the diagram that electricity which is gained from geothermal energy is a kind of renewable energy and it seems that producing electricity in a Geothermal power plant do not negatively affect the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ty from under-sea hot rocks consists of many different phases. The first step is about pumping...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, third, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34574468085 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0542245639 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4096344164 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.75 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163996731933 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601051306826 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723785035443 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128454659922 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063099272289 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.