The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps reveal how access to a city hospital was changed between 2007 and 2010.
In 2007, an area next to the Hospital road was for parking cars related to employees of the hospital and other people. Also, in this area, there were some places for the bus stop. But in 2010, the area was considered just for parking staff cars. Furthermore, two special parking areas were added for the bus station and public cars which were located to the left of the Hospital road and to the right of the hospital respectively.
In addition to the above changes, in 2010, two roundabouts were added in comparison with 2007, one of which was built in the junction between City road and Hospital road, and the other one was located in the other end of Hospital road IN junction with Ring road. the width of roads did not change in this three-year period of time.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... addition to the above changes, in 2010, two roundabouts were added in comparison...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...spital road IN junction with Ring road. the width of roads did not change in this t...
^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...roads did not change in this three-year period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 700.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54545454545 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23961029547 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1913202689 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226408269882 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109839943746 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876739691989 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188863218473 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615399997266 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.