The two maps show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons were relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons were relevant.

The maps depict the changes that occurred along the route to a city infirmary between 2007 and 2010.

In 2007, hospital road being the major route leading to the hospital was flanked on each side by 3 bus stops and had the staff and public car park on its east side. It was crossed on the south by city road and headed north towards the city hospital to make a T junction with ring road. The drive along ring road extended to the hospital’s south wing where the entrance to the car park was located.

Three years later, a round-about has replaced the junctions at each end of hospital road and the bus stops were removed to give room for a central bus station on the west side of the road. The staff car park maintained its initial location but became wider due to the removal of the bus stops. Another car park for public use was constructed near the west wing of the hospital.

Overall, the access route to the city healthcare center appears to have been made safer and more public friendly with the new constructions

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-12-08 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-11-10 Giang Tran 56 view
2024-11-08 chino0301 view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51063829787 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3019811571 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7824266948 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186294547712 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848286932078 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655958164473 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113806659581 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054093974478 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.