The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts showed a comparison of online sales of four different products in Canada in two different time periods in 2005 and 2010. Overall it is seen that food and beverage and video games sale had increased whereas home furnishings and electronics and appliance sale dipped in this same period of time.
In 2005, Electronics and Appliance were ranked topped as over one third 35% of retails market belong to this product. However, in the next 5 years, the sales drop by 5% reached 30%. Likewise, Home Furnishings items also decrease by 10% from 25% in 2005 to 15% in 2010.
Video games which were at the bottom of the chart in terms of sale in 2005 gained 5% sales increased in 2010 and it ranked second most sold item in 2010. It is evident that Food and Beverage items sales significantly increased. Sales of this product leapt to 32% in 2010 which was 22% in 2005
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... and appliance sale dipped in this same period of time. In 2005, Electronics and Appliance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xt 5 years, the sales drop by 5% reached 30%. Likewise, Home Furnishings items al...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56603773585 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38937431308 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9092721056 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236905252811 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105054005442 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935602474917 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163247658734 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580307752242 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.