The Two Pie Charts Below Show Some Employment Patterns in Great Britain in 1992

Essay topics:

The Two Pie Charts Below Show Some Employment Patterns in Great Britain in 1992

Given are two pie charts depicting the distribution of both gender workers in six categories of manual and non-manual sectors in Great Britain in 1992.
It is conspicuous that clerical or related accounted for the highest proportion of female workers, while working in other non-manual occupations comprised the vast majority in male employees.
When it comes to manual jobs, general laborers took up the most minority with 1% for women and 2% for men while the reverse was true for craft workforce with 27% for females, higher 1% than that of male. Additionally, the significant differences between two genders was the proportion of laborers employed in other manual positions with men was 24% higher threefold than women’s.
Regarding non-manual jobs, over one third of men working as managerial and professional was recorded in comparison with 29% in women workers. Meanwhile, the opposite was true for clerical and other non-manual jobs with the percentage of female workers higher than that of male with 31% and 9% respectively as opposed to 6% in these occupations of men workers.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie charts depicting the distributi...
^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k up the most minority with 1% for women and 2% for men while the reverse was tru...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21590909091 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88893496776 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.1932385387 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809184479829 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546277959866 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949745401455 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735676564955 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108317212375 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.