The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.
The pie chart illustrate that the two gender employee get select in different occupation and in UK in 1992.
It is clear that, proportion for Female shows that non-manual work was most popular among them while for male, it looks quite similar for both place. The notable factor is, Male got job in crafts was higher than female.
As the graph shows, according to manual work, only 31% women worked in all manual categories while the number for male was much higher, at 52%. The pivotal difference was in craft and similar position. The figure for male employee around at 24% which was 8 times greater than women at 3% in same categories. Meanwhile, In terms of other manual work and general labours, there was same proportion for both at 26% and 2% for both gender.
Furthermore, about Non-manual work place, 29% female employee get opportunity to work in managerial and professional compared with 36% for male worker. Lastly, the huge difference found on the position of clerical types in which female work had 31% while only 6% for male. In addition, other Non-manual work, had only 9% female worker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e get select in different occupation and in UK in 1992. It is clear that, prop...
^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s same proportion for both at 26% and 2% for both gender. Furthermore, about N...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86315789474 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45333172749 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9582096112 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0405591700577 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242142661958 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634937362021 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591421963805 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892911260642 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.