The two pie charts compare the expenses of an average household in a country between 1950 and 2010
The following pair of pie charts educes the nation's average domiciliary expenses for the years of 1950 and 2010 on majorly 6 household categories like housing, food, healthcare, education, transportation and others.
The primary diagram clearly promulgates, that the amount of money spent on housing was the most in 1950 with overall expense of about 72.1% followed by demand for food taking 11.2% of the total share. However in the span of next 6 decades an obverse scenario has been observed where the call for edibles hiked to approximately 3 times than in 1950, leaving behind the investment being made in housing at just 22% in 2010.
Furthermore, an appreciable amount of growth can be seen in the divisions of public ease like Transportation and Others, covering over 14% and 19.2% of the entire market in 2010. Also, the healthcare sector rolled to double its investments to 4.5% than that in 1950.
On one hand where all the sectors see increase in the finances being involved in them, apart from housing, education also faces a slight fall of .3% in expenses over it in the span of 60 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-22 | dhanashree | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | Ukhoching Chak Daniel | 67 | view |
- The table shows the average band score for the students from different language groups taking the IELTS Genral test for 2010 90
- Early year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The two pie charts compare the expenses of an average household in a country between 1950 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r food taking 11.2% of the total share. However in the span of next 6 decades an obvers...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68891366759 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677248677249 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.756439636 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21382255717 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964883455792 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081526305795 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125239104765 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905846787684 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.