The line graph compares the changes in the rates of unemployment in the US and Japan between 1993 and 1999.
As for the US, its rating was fluctuating and gradually decreasing over the period. In the beginning of the period it had the highest index of 7.0. In the following year, it started fluctuating and falling down to 5.5 in the end of march 1995. After that, it increased up to 6 and was slowly reducing again. In 1996, it leveled off and finished the year with the mark of 5.0.
By contrast, Japanese unemployment rating was the lowest in the beginning of the period, 2.5, it doubled its rating. In 1993, it suddenly grew up to 30, after that it was going upwards rapidly. In the end of march 1994, it aligned and started to fluctuate. Then, it rocketed to almost 4.5. In the following month it experienced a fall, growing up promptly up to 5. Moreover, it aligned with American rate at the same time, finishing the year with the same percentage.
Overall, although in the beginning of the period, American and Japanese rates were opposite, they finished the period with the same percentage.
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increasedsteadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below showsthe development of the village Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of thevillage 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993and March 1999 The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993and March 1999 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown b 73
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are se 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66326530612 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59251959508 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8583742769 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193125483765 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823168913732 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103473307549 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148632953452 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126415739371 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.