We were given two diagrams showing Darwin city waterfront in 2009 and after the 2014 reconstruction. We had to compare and describe both of them.
The maps illustrate the transformation of a waterfront in Darwin city between 2009 and 2014.
One of the most noticeable changes can be pointed out in the industrial area. To be more specific, the southern part of the vast grassland witnessed the appearance of a considerable number of trees, while a university unit was constructed at the northern end. Moreover, an alternative path for walking has been established as a feature of the industrial area. Besides, the result of the construction work situated a harbor in an area offshore.
In terms of subtle alternation, it is visually evident that the area surrounded by a footpath also noticed an addition of a small swimming pool next to the lake, where an insignificant piece of the industrial section was sited. Finally, the residential units just to the right of the university have been extended to meet the demand of the population.
Overall, the reconstruction of the Darwin city waterfront featured many elements, most of which were installed to promote more conveniences and facilities for local inhabitants.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21264367816 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20017938624 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0166740094 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940645021003 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468374994947 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838912284343 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936749989895 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984275047869 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.