The chart gives information about the extent ear people of society according to age groups and literacy levels including Higher degree, firs degree and other qualifications in the year 2002.
All three graduate groups experienced a dramatic rise in income between ages 21-25.as can be seen from the chart that that people who had the first degree of education increasing significantly from around $370 at ages 21-25 to nearly $700 at ages 36-40. After that amount of money was approximately steady by ages45. although there was a small fall before ages 56-60, this number climbed to about $690.
On the other hand, people who had a higher degree follows a similar trend and rose steadily from nearly $390 (ages 21-25) to around $750 (ages 41-45). however confront to a drop trend, reached their maximum slightly earlier at ages 56-60 to almost $780.the other qualifications trend was obviously upward from over $400 at ages 21-25 to about $820. followed by a consistent decrease to just below $700 at ages 56-60. Strikingly, only at 46-50 and 51-55 age groups, people with a higher degree and people who had other degrees received the same amount of money per week.
- The bar chart gives us the information about the life expectancy in Japan ,Korea, United states and Indonesia and the table shows us the change in the life expectancy between 1953 and 2008. 67
- Weekly earnings of full time graduate employees by type of degree and age 64
- The bar graph gives us the information about the life expectancy in Japan ,United states ,Korea and Indonesia and the table shows us the life expectancy between 1953 and 2008 .summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... ages 21-25 to nearly 00 at ages 36-40. After that amount of money was approximately ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ney was approximately steady by ages45. although there was a small fall before ages 56-6...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... 90 ages 21-25 to around 50 ages 41-45. however confront to a drop trend, reached their...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
... 90 ages 21-25 to around 50 ages 41-45. however confront to a drop trend, reached their...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...rom over 00 at ages 21-25 to about 20. followed by a consistent decrease to just below ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49295132939 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3082735509 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172349419199 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795667825148 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460081893981 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119199175521 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300918358673 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.