The provided charts give information about comparison variant units of electricity by fuel source between Australia and France in two different years 1980 and 2000. Overall, there were increasing in total number of units that were produced in both countries Australia and France from 1980 to 2000. In Australia the highest units were coal in both year while in France coal and natural gas had the same number in the year 1980 whereas nuclear power had the highest units in 2000.
Looking in more details, in Australia in 1980, the total number was 100 units which coal participated by 50 units while the hydro power and natural gas had the same units 20. In 2000 the total number were 170 units which coal had the highest number of units 130 while the natural gas and oil had same units .
On other hand, in 1980 in France coal and natural gas had the same units 25 and oil shared by 20 while 15 units for nuclear power and only 5 for hydro power from the total 90 units. Contrary in 2000 nuclear power had the highest units 126 while coal and oil had the same units 25 from the total number 180 units
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 2000. Overall, there were increasing in total number of units that were produ...
^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e the natural gas and oil had same units . On other hand, in 1980 in France coa...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...units 25 from the total number 180 units
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04314167796 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.386138613861 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.8099396924 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0270497006893 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207670307217 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244705769317 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0236209574701 0.15604864568 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198965329055 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.