writting task 1
Given are two figures providing a comparison of the percentage of energy used for different kinds of purpose in per Austrailan family and the prevalance of greenhouse gas emission from these activities
It is evident from the information provided that almost people spent the largest proportion of their using on heating while water heating was the area receiving the second share of consuming and it is also the cause of greenhouse gas emissions the most.
The percentage of spending on heating was highest in Austrailian household at 42% while they allocated just 7% of their using energy for refrigeration.In terms of water heating , the figure was double as much as other appliances , at 30% and 15% respectively.Lighting and cooling were the two least outstanding groups in the amount of consumed energy with 2% and 4% in total.
It is also interesting to note that the popularity of greenhouse is far more common in water heating than in any other factor revealed at approxiamately 32%, which was twice as much as that of heating. An amount of 28% of other appliances was seen in causing greenhouse gas emission effect , which was followed by refrigeration with only 14%. Lighting accounted for 8% in comparision with only a negligeble 3% of cooling in Austrailian families greenhouse gas emissions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | duonggiahuy | view | |
| 2018-11-13 | nguyen thi lien | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Austrailan family and the prevalance of greenhouse gas emission from these activ...
^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...house gas emission from these activities It is evident from the information provi...
^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage of spending on heating was highest in Austrailian household at 42% while th...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...of their using energy for refrigeration.In terms of water heating , the figure was...
^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... refrigeration.In terms of water heating , the figure was double as much as other...
^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of water heating , the figure was double as much as other appliances , at 30% and...
^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... was double as much as other appliances , at 30% and 15% respectively.Lighting an...
^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lighting
...ppliances , at 30% and 15% respectively.Lighting and cooling were the two least outstand...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n causing greenhouse gas emission effect , which was followed by refrigeration wit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1023255814 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14692606757 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567441860465 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.012179893 43.030603864 309% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 219.4 112.824112599 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 13.2329268293 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 10.3012195122 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 11.0658536585 253% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.