Amount spent on comsumer goods
The bar chart compares the expenditure on 6 types of products in 4 countries : Germany, Italy, France and Britain.
Overall, six different items were comsumed in Britain were the highest of other countries. In addition, consumers spent the most money on photographic film.
British people spent more money than German people in all 6 items. Photographic film was the most popular goods in both Britain and Germany, which was over 170 thousand pounds and just under 150 thousand pounds, respectively. The figure for spending on toys was the second highest. British people and German people were comsumed more than 145 pounds in that product. About remaining goods personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes and CDs, they efforted remain between 145 thousand pounds and approximately 160 thousand pounds.
In the other two nations, Italian spent more money on personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes than French, about 5 thousand pounds in each types. The volume of CDs and photographic film in France were higher than theese in Italy, which was over 4 thousand pounds in separately types. But the figure for consumed toys in both two nations were exactly the same at around 169 thousand pounds.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- Some people believe that developments in the fields of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligence than hu 84
- Responsible tourists could preserve both the local culture and the environment Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six month period in 2011 73
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 193.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25388601036 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53503456684 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 127.690721649 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 290.88556701 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2999900295 44.8134815571 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 76.5299724578 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 16.8248392259 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.94845360825 253% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117912016337 0.216113520407 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465288061168 0.0766984524023 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375421070791 0.0603063233224 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710944286643 0.12726935374 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560628270437 0.0580467560999 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 8.37731958763 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.