the chart below give information on the ages of population of Yemen and Italy and projections for 2050.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant.

Essay topics:

the chart below give information on the ages of population of Yemen and Italy and projections for 2050.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant.

The given pie charts depict the number of people of distinct ages in two cities Yemen and Italy in 2000 and 2050.the data is calibrated in percentage.

It can be vividly seen that, the data of Yemen residence in 2000, youngster led with highest 50.1 percent whereas the people of 15-59 and 60+ years occupied second and third position with 46.3 and 3.6 percent respectively. From 2050, some changes will be seen in age groups. The strength of 15-59 years group will be increased while the the number of young people will declined.

Turning to rest of description, from 2000 in Italy, the masses of 15-59 years old had largest 61.6 percent followed by 60+ and 0 to 14 years old with 24 and 14.3 percent orderly. Further, from 2050, the number of older people will escalate. As far as comparison is concerned, Italy contain more adult citizens where Yemen had more young people.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...-59 years group will be increased while the the number of young people will declined. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...-59 years group will be increased while the the number of young people will declined. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decline'
Suggestion: decline
...ile the the number of young people will declined. Turning to rest of description, fr...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 937.175257732 78% => OK
No of words: 154.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73376623377 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34023127244 2.54303337028 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 198.9 290.88556701 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7877891204 44.8134815571 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 76.5299724578 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 16.8248392259 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993153754254 0.216113520407 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562251689587 0.0766984524023 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528467222676 0.0603063233224 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840646769703 0.12726935374 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432995200636 0.0580467560999 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 70.7449484536 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 8.71597938144 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 7.59969072165 111% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.