The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give an analysis of weight issues among residents in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. In 1995, the youngest age group had the fewest number of weight issues, with more than 70% of 20-29 year-old considered as having a healthy weight. Excess weight only posed as a significant problem for 40-49 year-old group,from which 20-30 percent of people was assessed as being obese. In fact, underweight was a more serious societal issue, affecting more than 20% of each age group, and the elderly in particular, with over 40% of them classified as underweight.
In stark contrast to this, in 2015, underweight was only a problem to 20-29 age group, taking up about 20%, and the number of underweight elderly people had fallen by 10%. The chart clearly shows that, in modern times, obesity stood as a considerable issue, from the age of 30 upwards. In fact, there was a steady increase in almost every age group with regard to this problem. It is important to note that, by the age of 60, less than 50% of each group were considered to have an ideal weight.
In conclusion, it is clear that there has been a significant increase in the number of obese people in Charlestown, while there was a general drop in the number of underweight people between 1955 and 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , from
...ificant problem for 40-49 year-old group,from which 20-30 percent of people was asses...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 937.175257732 112% => OK
No of words: 222.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72522522523 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58747223756 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 127.690721649 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 1.44329896907 831% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4030433831 44.8134815571 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 76.5299724578 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 16.8248392259 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 4.34317383033 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111334870766 0.216113520407 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593226745665 0.0766984524023 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620055472048 0.0603063233224 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936469252201 0.12726935374 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034395151548 0.0580467560999 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 8.37731958763 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 70.7449484536 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 8.71597938144 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.