Dear Michael,
I am writing this letter to express my concern over the decision of demolishing a century-old building – Rohtas Fort – due to non-availability of funds needed to preserve the building. I am downright saddened by the news as the strenuous efforts, monetary and non-monetary, by our forefathers to preserve this ancient building would go futile.
The building, built by the ruler of Potohar Plateau, is of utmost importance due to its historical significance, and it truly depicts the culture and history of the Mughals era in Asia. Moreover, National Geographic had made a documentary on this fort which went live a month ago. Soon after the media coverage, a number of tourists, national and foreigner flocked to visit the site which ultimately benefited the local businesses and traders. In the future, local council office should devise an appropriate advertisement strategy to promote this tourist site on different forums such as social media.
Considering the exponential increase in the number of visitors, there are many ways that could be introduced to generate the revenue and earmark it for the purpose of repair and maintenance. One of the best solutions is to introduce the concept of entry tickets and offer guided tours to foreign tourists. Further, a formal request should be made to key stakeholders, local businessmen, and charities, to support this cause by fixed monthly contributions. Revenue generated from these streams would suffice the budget required for maintenance of the building.
In the light of above, hope local council will call on a meeting to change its decision in the best interests of local community.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you feel I can contribute any further to this noble cause.
Regards,
Ammar
Resident of Rawat
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 937.175257732 163% => OK
No of words: 290.0 206.0 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2724137931 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97694070834 2.54303337028 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 127.690721649 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637931034483 0.622605031667 102% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 290.88556701 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1936006362 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 76.5299724578 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 16.8248392259 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0944902861112 0.216113520407 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280364520173 0.0766984524023 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301916377618 0.0603063233224 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528584314427 0.12726935374 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221966559622 0.0580467560999 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 8.37731958763 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 70.7449484536 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 7.45979381443 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 7.59969072165 137% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 41.2886597938 254% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.