The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of
meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the amount of four different types of food which consumed in European country from 1979 to 2004.
Look at the line graph, it is immediately obvious that the consumption of chicken was the only one increased and also was the most commonly used food in the European country during the period shown. Whereas the expenditure on beef, lamb, and fish were decline.
In 1979, the consumption of beef was highest, at about 220 grams per person per week. While the figure for chicken, lamb and fish were lower, the lowest is fish at about 60 grams per person per week.
From 1979 to 2004, the was an significant changing in those types of food. General in trend, there was an steady growth in chicken, which reach a peark at about 250 grams per person per week. Meanwhile, the figure beef, lamb and fish were decrease. The expenditure on beef in the first period fluctuated by over 70 grams from 1979 to 1984, after that decreased rapidly to about 100 grams per person per week. This amount still were the highest in reduction of 3 types of food. Throughout the remainder of period, there was a gradual decrease in fish, which fell to about 40 grams per person per week by the year 2004. This was slightly more than the figure for lamb, with just dropped to 60 grams per person per week at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph compares the amount of fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in European country from 1979 to 2004. Look at the line graph, it is immediatel...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on beef, lamb, and fish were decline. In 1979, the consumption of beef was hig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t about 60 grams per person per week. From 1979 to 2004, the was an significan...
^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... week. From 1979 to 2004, the was an significant changing in those types of ...
^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...es of food. General in trend, there was an steady growth in chicken, which reach a...
^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ghout the remainder of period, there was a gradual decrease in fish, which fell t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 206.0 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5375 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19465496529 2.54303337028 86% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.622605031667 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 290.88556701 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1882534495 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 76.5299724578 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 4.34317383033 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0962150395041 0.216113520407 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504599828138 0.0766984524023 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503349777444 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978037179822 0.12726935374 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579038325142 0.0580467560999 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 8.37731958763 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 8.71597938144 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 7.59969072165 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.