The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph gives information about count of tourists which were visited on island of Caribbean in between 2010 till 2017.
To commence with, it is clear by analysing graph that, higher count of visitors (0.7 million) were used to stay in island, yet only 0.2 million number of people were prefer to stay on cruise ships. Thus, total 1 million of individuals visited island in 2010. In next year of 2011, 0.5 million people were hang-on island while 0.6 were on cruise ship. Hence, 1.4 million total number of masses were visited. Apart from that, in 2012, count of staying visitors on island was decreased upto 0.1 million, however on cruise ship, their count was increased with 1.4 million and total of both of stays were 1.5 million. Furthermore, in next two eras, number of staying visitors on island was increased with 0.5 and 1 million. Yet, on cruise ship, their numerical was similar with difference of 1 million, whereas their total became 2.5 million respectively.
Moreover, in era of 2015, 1.4 million of visitors were stay on island, yet count of individuals on cruise ship was constant from previous era to this which was 1.5 million. Therefore, grand total of couple of sites became 2.8 million. Instead, in 2016, people who were stay on island was proliferated upto 1.6 million. On contrast, visitors stag on cruise ship was became lower to 1.3 million and total was about 2.6 million. Lastly, in 2017, couple of hang-on sites had similar count with difference of 0.5 million and result of total upto 3.5 million.
Overall, count of visitors on island was higher than on cruise ship. Moreover, their sum up was proliferated with each era.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'staid', 'stayed'.
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...a of 2015, 1.4 million of visitors were stay on island, yet count of individuals on ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'staid', 'stayed'.
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...lion. Instead, in 2016, people who were stay on island was proliferated upto 1.6 mil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, therefore, thus, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.48453608247 281% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 26.3917525773 246% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 937.175257732 147% => OK
No of words: 284.0 206.0 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84154929577 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36452772679 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 127.690721649 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43661971831 0.622605031667 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 290.88556701 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 1.44329896907 693% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3021048541 44.8134815571 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 76.5299724578 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 16.8248392259 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 4.34317383033 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128170734238 0.216113520407 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717373521409 0.0766984524023 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103388333447 0.0603063233224 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143961774507 0.12726935374 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156326557912 0.0580467560999 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 70.7449484536 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 7.59969072165 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.