In multitude areas, several people are deeply in need of new homes however inner-city houses cannot be constructed due to the fact of inadequate space. These future needed homes can be built in the peripheral areas nonetheless some people are of the opinion it is not possible since we should conserve this area. I totally agree with people who want to protect the countryside however I think building houses for homeless people have the priority over other issues to take a look at.
To embark upon, I think due to the high number of modern high-rise skyscrapers which filled the most spaces of cities and the population explosion there is not adequate space to build new houses in cities. Consequently, houses should be built in the countrysides. These areas are not really equipped for living, many Facilities should be implemented to form an acceptable place for living in these areas. For instance, In Australia, about one year ago according to the fact that Sydney was full of the low-rise building they could not free some spaces for new buildings and at the same time they did not want to swallow the beauty of the city by building high-rise buildings so they move all new buildings to the outside parts of the city. This project was totally costly for the Australian government but it was worthwhile since many people were given a house to live in.
On the other hand, it is believed by some that constructing new houses would damage the nature of the outskirts of the city and we as a human should conserve them in the best way as we can. Most of these countrysides are the place for natural and aquatic habitats and by constructing new places we will face not only the loss of irreplaceable species but also natural trees and plants would vanish and this can bring many unfavorable consequences including, increasing the number of air pollutants and acid rain as there are no leaves to remove CO2 or pollutants from the air.
By way of conclusion, I believe that destroying the countryside would adversely affect the ecological balance and it is totally against green environment however I am a follower of this truism that we should also consider the rights of people who do not have a house to live in.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, look, nonetheless, really, so, while, as to, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 4.92783505155 304% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 32.9175257732 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 26.3917525773 208% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 937.175257732 196% => OK
No of words: 387.0 206.0 188% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75452196382 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64149933033 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 127.690721649 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516795865633 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 290.88556701 202% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 16.3608247423 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.6295091231 44.8134815571 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.272727273 76.5299724578 219% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 35.1818181818 16.8248392259 209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 4.34317383033 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35423419429 0.216113520407 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117684178047 0.0766984524023 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574306360494 0.0603063233224 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191484739859 0.12726935374 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755631054122 0.0580467560999 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 8.37731958763 221% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 70.7449484536 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 7.45979381443 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 41.2886597938 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 8.54432989691 187% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.