new advance in communication can close to people. do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

new advance in communication can close to people. do you agree or disagree?

Over the last decade new technology develops has been part of a new communication age. This has represented for our society a change in the way that it can keep connect, until in many cases that relationship that people can establish using this technology. It is completely true that new advance in communication can close to people, also it is likely that people spent more hours using it and lose the personal contact. The influence of this development will be analysed before draw a conclusion.

Talk about technology it is almost a synonyms of connection and when this is necessary the new technology like smart phones, tables, lap tops, allows keep connect an any place. In spite that is a good advantage can have this posibiliti of connection in any where, a lot people using in place no apropied. For example now is common in family dinners looks people just using the phone or even on cinemas during the function. Therefore this new connection posibility has positive and negative aspects.

This new access in which can interact with any person has permited keep touch with people that are separate for a big distance how is the case that families that living in different countries. But in many case now the people prefer to do a phone call or use a cam connection than visit or meet with. A good example is when many sons decide call to their parents instead of visit. In this way it can see that for a lot people can be a benefit and to another not.

To sum up the technology has both benefits as well as disaventages. Depends of each one how can influence in our lifes. In the foreseeable future will exit better alternative to interact and it is likely that can affect our lifes.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. This has represented for our society a change in the way that it can keep con...
^^
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...til in many cases that relationship that people can establish using this technolo...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a synonym' or simply 'synonyms'?
Suggestion: a synonym; synonyms
.... Talk about technology it is almost a synonyms of connection and when this is necessar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...n have this posibiliti of connection in any where, a lot people using in place no apropie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...or even on cinemas during the function. Therefore this new connection posibility has posi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...sum up the technology has both benefits as well as disaventages. Depends of each one how c...
^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'as well as', 'in many cases', 'to sum up']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25386996904 0.220444632235 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.15479876161 0.167888034529 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0866873065015 0.0606518309736 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0371517027864 0.0506257000042 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0340557275542 0.118615021944 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.12693498452 0.107062808482 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0278637770898 0.041066498444 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61599463299 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0185758513932 0.0385302599488 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0030959752322 0.00132118243153 234% => OK
Determiners: 0.123839009288 0.0714148451538 173% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0340557275542 0.0191574576366 178% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.030959752322 0.00930345855455 333% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1705.0 1141.60824742 149% => OK
No of words: 302.0 206.134020619 147% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64569536424 5.53046319177 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.78085437643 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.304635761589 0.284621296913 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.205298013245 0.211203875043 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155629139073 0.133321485273 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102649006623 0.0843313296314 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61599463299 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 127.690721649 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529801324503 0.622163163488 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.1372787671 62.8969750728 86% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 12.9587628866 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1333333333 16.4300151701 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.208743971 44.7399317507 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 90.9928171075 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 16.4300151701 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.613754768223 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.09278350515 287% => OK
Readability: 40.6631346578 37.5504026743 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.80821917808 1.13073093955 160% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277831399868 0.331212695627 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.100867096144 0.0927372745006 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0825536548773 0.0736520305886 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.505943414498 0.579516596996 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129476943359 0.180689518051 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108953351589 0.122183219658 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707130625018 0.0765303033291 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.343485082423 0.211926503985 162% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0665915177188 0.0737400523855 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187405515763 0.203819188451 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546324717029 0.067151250289 81% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.45360824742 80% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.48453608247 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.0206185567 174% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 4.73195876289 106% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 1.03092783505 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.56701030928 234% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 8.32989690722 156% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.