The pie chart show the percentage of Oscar winners
The pie charts below show the percentage of Oscar winners for seven different films genre in 2003 and 2008. In general, the most Oscar winners in thriller films. Especially, about 50 percent of thriller film actors in 2003. The number of Oscar winners decreased sharply approximate a third in 2008. We can see from the pie charts that almost 33 percent of actors won the Oscar award about a mixture of action films, comedy films, and horror films in 2003. The proportion of winners has changed. The percentage of actors who won the Oscar award increased rapidly just over 35 percent about three genres: horror, comedy, and action. The least popular genre in Oscar was romantic. Nearby 5 percent of Oscar winners in 2003 and approximately 6 percent of actors who won Oscar in 2008. The other genres are documentary and science fiction about 10 percent of winners in 2003. Therefore, the proportion of this genre gradually rose to just under 20 percent in 200
- Some people say the Internet has many disadvantages than advantages 56
- children should always follow their parents advice 56
- Young people spend more time on cultural activities such as music and theatre 56
- Children should always follow their parent s advice 56
- Sports help to a greater extent to build peace in world Do you agree or disagree Give some examples and include relevant experiences in your response 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'films'' or 'film's'?
Suggestion: films'; film's
...ge of Oscar winners for seven different films genre in 2003 and 2008. In general, the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 632, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ree genres: horror, comedy, and action. The least popular genre in Oscar was romant...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, therefore, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80606060606 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43185169428 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 127.690721649 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 290.88556701 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3796411551 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0909090909 76.5299724578 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 16.8248392259 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.29896907216 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356844787361 0.216113520407 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149105396189 0.0766984524023 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135251090241 0.0603063233224 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356844787361 0.12726935374 280% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 8.37731958763 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 70.7449484536 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 7.45979381443 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 7.59969072165 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 41.2886597938 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.