In Some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people thik that this is good for a country, while other believe that the government should control Salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
There are countries in the world with high per capita income on average having few people earn to an extreme limit. This is considered to be good for the country by some people, on the other hand few believe that this should be controlled by the government as how much one can earn.
We live in a versatile world wich variety of people, many cultures, several geographic and with many income capacities. Today's world is mostly driven by money and it is one of the vital fuels supporting globalization and other mutual benefits between the countries. Over the time some countries have become very rich for example USA, Canada etc. where people earn considerably higher than other countries. This is definitely a major contributing factor showing how economically well a country is doing. There are people in some countries with earn outstandingly well and become very rich leaving a gap with majority of the population of the country or may be for other countries as well.
Concerns have been raised by some people to put a check on the earning limit for such people. The idea behind may be to bridge the gap in the society and bring uniformity in the people to avoid dissatisfaction or inferiority complexes. To an extent the idea sounds logical. However, there would be consequences, if this is implemented by any government, like distress among the talented and capable pool of people who will feel suffocated after such ban is put in place.
In my opinion earning limitation is not a logical decision. Reasons can be many like, why a person should be controlled to earn just because we want to bring him down to someone who is not that capable. This would have a negative impact among the people with handsome salaries and will also result in a loss of motivation and enthusiasm for the next generation. Next generation may not give their best for the country thinking that they will eventually be controlled after a certain limit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-09 | sanjeev_satyam | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.48453608247 267% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 4.92783505155 244% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 32.9175257732 46% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 937.175257732 172% => OK
No of words: 334.0 206.0 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82035928144 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.78020617076 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69867956286 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 127.690721649 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 290.88556701 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9812460921 44.8134815571 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 76.5299724578 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 4.34317383033 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349386883328 0.216113520407 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116485529199 0.0766984524023 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899822693307 0.0603063233224 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235193285389 0.12726935374 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089454563599 0.0580467560999 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 8.71597938144 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 41.2886597938 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.