Some people say gifts are important while other think the human presence provides a better source of contact. Discuss both views and give your opinion in conclusion.
A gift is a token of love. We give presents to our loved ones and family and the feeling is very fulfilling. We give gifts on different occasions, like on birthdays, weddings, graduations, parties and more. Giving gifts should not be a daily chore.
Each event has a different impact and value. The affection and intentions behind are different. Here is a research that says the gift of an extraordinary value leads to a crook relation. Because all of us want something in return. Either we agree or not. Deep down we like to be pampered and taken care of. For example, once I posted an expensive gift to a close friend on her, it was a beautiful watch and she really liked it very much. But, she in her heart thought that she is bound to give me something as expensive in return to prove her friendship. Soon things between us got imbalanced and she slowly stepped back. The situation was inevitable.
By contrast, being there on small moments with your dear ones can change the whole picture. It establishes and strengthens the relationship. A hug, a kiss, and affection can heal the wounds quickly. Scientists have proven that the human body is a source of emotional radiations and have the capability of mending hearts. For example, when a child will always run to his mother when in time of pain, failure, discomfort. Because the magnitude of love waves work like a miracle. It works like a sacred fountain which washes all the dirt from heart and soul. But this is a gem hard to find these days, as people have become busier.
So, in conclusion, both actions depicts pure feelings. Each of them plays a vital role in enriching the human bond. But, I feel that physical presence is more valuable, as gifts are temporary and most of the times they do not show love.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-16 | Aiman Amjad | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ntentions behind are different. Here is a research that says the gift of an extraordinary ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dinary value leads to a crook relation. Because all of us want something in return. Ei...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n in time of pain, failure, discomfort. Because the magnitude of love waves work like a...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve become busier. So, in conclusion, both actions depicts pure feelings. Each...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, then, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 5.05154639175 297% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 32.9175257732 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 937.175257732 156% => OK
No of words: 317.0 206.0 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60567823344 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58575806141 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 127.690721649 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627760252366 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 290.88556701 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.83505154639 272% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 12.6804123711 197% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 16.3608247423 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5817200301 44.8134815571 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.4 76.5299724578 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.68 16.8248392259 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44 4.34317383033 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 7.41237113402 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127938768746 0.216113520407 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294158421365 0.0766984524023 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331880763609 0.0603063233224 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793654440139 0.12726935374 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335484071113 0.0580467560999 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.6 8.37731958763 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 7.45979381443 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.57 8.71597938144 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 7.59969072165 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 41.2886597938 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 8.62886597938 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 8.54432989691 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.