There is a good deal of evidence that increasing car use is contributing to global warming and having other undesirable effects on people’s health and well-being.
What can be done to discourage people from using their cars?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is true that automobiles are major contributor in temperature hike among several other factors such as fastest growing industries and infrastructure expansion. In modern age, rapid growth in usage of vehicles are affecting our environment then the past, therefore, harming global atmosphere and people health as well which is being cascaded in future too. This essay will discuss about our environment and people well-being.
To begin with, carriage running on gasoline were never environment friendly neither it is in the modern age. It is defeating our atmosphere by polluting it from emitted harmful and toxic gases. Therefore, inhaling polluted air affects a person lung and causes severe health issues. For example, according to a popular newspaper survey, reported number of cancer cases has just doubled in this decade as compared to last one. In addition, most people don’t realize it, but noise pollution is no laughing matter. Not only annoying and inconvenient sometime, but large amount of noise pollution causes various hearing problems. Moreover, heat generated from vehicle engine and air conditioners are also creating temperature variations which cannot be ignored too.
To counter this, governance body should run awareness program to educate people towards avoid or less usage of cars, use car-pool and public transport. Encourage them to save environment so that they can breathe in fresh air. Moreover, some policies and purposeful clauses to buy a vehicle, increased road taxes and fuels price can help to limit the usage to save the environment.
All things considered, health of a person should always be a priority which will come from a healthy environment, so usage of motor vehicle should have limited to the specific purpose only. Although, it cannot be stopped in today’s world, but some strict policies can help to control it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 5.05154639175 277% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 937.175257732 169% => OK
No of words: 295.0 206.0 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3593220339 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76628862778 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 127.690721649 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664406779661 0.622605031667 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 290.88556701 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5842841991 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 76.5299724578 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 4.34317383033 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176756340007 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503168943053 0.0766984524023 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390200611944 0.0603063233224 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101019216071 0.12726935374 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024317091523 0.0580467560999 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 8.71597938144 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 41.2886597938 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.