You have been to a business meeting at another company and saw a piece of equipment which can be useful for your company too. Write a letter to your manager about the following:
Describe the piece of equipment you have seen
Why having the same equipment would be useful for your company
Offer your assistance in buying the equipment
Dear Sir,
I am writing to recommend the use of pencil microphones at our company meetings. Last week I attended a business meeting at the Infosys campus in Bangalore. That is when I saw this useful equipment.
This microphone has a small stand to keep it in upright position on the table. It is as thin as a pencil and has a lever to adjust its height. The advantage of using this equipment is that it allows delegates to be heard without having to shout. What’s more, it also has a remote connection to the display where the name of the speaker is displayed as one speaks. Since we also have meetings with a large number of attendees, this instrument will be extremely useful to us.
I checked that such microphones are available online on amazon.com at a reasonable price. If you wish, I can send the website links for your perusal.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Yours Sincerely,
Nick Smith
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...peaks. Since we also have meetings with a large number of attendees, this instrument will be extr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 937.175257732 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 206.0 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68926892529 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.685185185185 0.622605031667 110% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 290.88556701 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 16.3608247423 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4667203356 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.75 76.5299724578 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 16.8248392259 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 4.34317383033 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255712148778 0.216113520407 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746891344164 0.0766984524023 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620032220352 0.0603063233224 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119219366659 0.12726935374 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328760807035 0.0580467560999 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 8.37731958763 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 70.7449484536 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 8.54432989691 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.