1. Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The use of animal for experimentation has raised a controversial issue. While some people believe that animal testing is beneficial to human, others strongly argue that is unethical and must be stopped.
On the one hand, animals play a significant role in laboratory. Due to the advancement in biology, scientist found out that animals share similarities in gene with human so that animal such as mice will be injected with diseases to measure the drug effectiveness. If it is successful, the drug can be mass-produced and millions of human lives can be saved. Another point to mention is that how scientist could examine the new drug without animals. Although different alternatives have been introduced to reduce the use of animals in research, they cannot completely replace the role of animals. For example, some special-programmed computers have been developed so as to predict the quality of new drug. However, it is not effective because the results are usually wrong or not as precise as experiment on animals. Therefore, use of animals in laboratory is inevitable.
On the other hand, the use of animals in research is unethical. Every year, millions of animals all over the world which comes from breeding centers are used in experiment and most of them die as the result of the experiment. Furthermore, some animals which are alive after experiment would be euthanized to avoid the later pain and distress. Another point worth mentioning is using animals in experimentation may lead to unreliable result. For instance, cage environment can raise the level of stress in animals which can lead to fluctuation in the final result. Furthermore, the more unstable the results are, the more animals are tested to examine. Hence, it is clearly unethical to use animals in experimentation.
In conclusion, animals play an important part in scientific research. However, I strongly disagree with the idea of using them in drug testing. In my opinion, it is against the moral norms and ineffective. Instead, alternatives should be further developed to avoid the use of animals in experimentation.
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animal suffer while others are in favour of the becaus 56
- 1 Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of 61
- 1 Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of 73
- 1 Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rogrammed computers have been developed so as to predict the quality of new drug. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20294117647 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13429931244 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526470588235 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4442232171 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2380952381 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1904761905 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337701302207 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103624808452 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650951371329 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219810075679 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496065173596 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.