Sentiments diverge on whether each individual should be held accountable for the local environmental protection. Although this new emerging stance has not received the multitudes’ support, I am of the vantage point that the shift in responsibility from the government to residents seems to create better results as well as form higher public awareness in environmental protection.
Admittedly, once each inhabitant is in charge of shielding the environment, the positive upshots can be reaped at ease. Perceptibly, notwithstanding passionate devotion from politics in enacting laws to lessen the degradation in the environment, they are not able to cover all the problems. The story, however, will go differently if residents take over the responsibilities now that they are far closer to the local situation. Therefore, even the tiniest issues are likely to be tackled radically. That is the reason why the government periodically longs to accumulate voters’ standpoints to plan pragmatic solutions for urgent and grave cases.
Further and even more importantly, people’s consciousness regarding environmental perseverance will be solid. Woefully, humans these days are subjective and nonchalant in maintaining and enhancing the quality of nature since they assure that it is not their own business but the government. Even when they recognise the adverse bearing of discriminating rubbish into the aquatic bodies, they ignore sensible sewage treatment as it financially negates their profits. Conversely, if they are delegated to shield the local living surrounding, they will do it in earnest by actively categorizing types of rubbish into different bags or simply putting discarded items into bins, instead of the ground or the sea. This suggests that residents seem to be positively cognizant of their daily behavior in getting on with the environment.
By way of conclusion, enforcing each person to be responsible in improving the local nature is the wise method.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59800664452 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26067506113 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634551495017 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5333773006 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105831379905 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352806577027 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246668551186 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601593145128 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184880944736 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.