13. In the mordern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, people have a tendency to change their habits in life. Typically, we have seen the transformation from using animal-based products to plant-based ones, which makes some people consider the importance of the role of animals in some fields, such as food production, medical research, or the garment industry. From my perspective, alternative animal products should be encouraged to develop, but in some cases, the use of animals is unavoidable.
On the one hand, we have found a lot of ways to use animal-based commodities strictly. In the food industry, various meat companies promote the productions and development of alternative meat products without deficient in vitamins and micronutrients, which are the essential elements for physical health. For example, the Impossible food companies in the USA have gained enormous success in developing a plant-based burger, which contains no animal products in it. This invention helps to reduce excessive consumption of meat in American, as a result, prevents various potential health issues, such as heart disease, diabetes. Moreover, we see the breakthrough step in the garment industry. Because of technological advancement, we do not need to sacrifice animal life for clothing. Synthetic fur and synthetic silk are the preferable options for those who have a passion for expensive fur products.
On the other hand, animals play an essential role in vivisections, especially in vaccine development and biology. Animal experimentation and research have produced numerous medical and scientific breakthroughs that could not have been made in any other way. Without the support of animals, vaccine production could complete and widely used by humans. Thanks to the contribution of mice and primates, the world has seen success in developing gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.
In conclusion, we could not turn the role of the animal in our life down completely. We must cooperate with a suitable method to limit unnecessary animal-based yields and apply animals widely in required fields.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50157728707 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13665256258 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574132492114 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6065378126 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239631334658 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784623268136 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657306328228 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151476761913 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706677174398 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.