Advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promotes quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that advertisements enable customers to purchase the goods in quantity rather than in quality. From my perspective, however, this idea is not always the case.
On the one hand, it is true that advertising can play an important role in the sale boost. This is because advertisements can spread the information about the products or services and lure the audiences to pay for them unconsciously. For example, it is TV advertising that vividly tells its spectators not to miss out on a sort of two-for-one commodities manufactured by a freshly minted firm, urging them to grab this golden opportunity and purchase these products in bulk. Under this circumstance, the customers may be more likely to follow this suggestion impulsively.
On the other hand, advertising also encourages the consumers to enjoy high-quality goods created by the prestigious companies. Compared with the ones for selling goods in abundance, advertisements are more often hired by the established corporations to broadcast their latest products so as to meet the demand of their loyal customers. In most cases, advertising on mass media may help technological businesses, such the Apple Corporation, to transmit the information about their most newly innovated devices, persuading the potential buyers to keep abreast of the latest situation. Consequently, advertising is promoting the goods of high quality.
To conclude, in the light of the statements above, I strongly maintain that people should not be radical about the advertisement for it serves as distinct functions, including promoting goods quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ions to broadcast their latest products so as to meet the demand of their loyal customer...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns, including promoting goods quality.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, may, so, as to, for example, sort of, in most cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43824701195 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24691662657 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5375155169 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.090909091 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163262617728 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735027807203 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781055134521 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108511215449 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485050453562 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.