All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
Charged automobiles should substitute motorized vehicles, and the government should outlaw such vehicles that combust diesel and natural gas. This essay agrees with the above statement because electric cars are more environmentally friendly, and they are relatively economical to maintain.
Electric cars are more environmentally sound. They produce only about a third of the CO2 emissions compared to fuel operated vehicles and thus contribute to lowering the greenhouse gas emissions. Decreased combustion from motorized cars will lead to a drop in the smog levels of hugely populated cities. For example, France has the largest number of electric car purchasers as they aim to replace the combust vehicles and lower their country’s contribution to CO2 gas emissions.
Battery operated automobiles are more economical to maintain. The maintenance and repairs of the installed batteries are much cheaper than the counterparts of the combust engines. Also, some states have set much lower taxes on electric cars compared to motorcars. Therefore, overall, it costs less to own and maintain an electrically charging vehicle than a conventional auto. As a result, in Norway, according to a survey, an increasing number of people are inclining towards electric automobiles to be their preferred purchasing choice, to take advantage of the lowered taxes and the related facilities provided by the governments.
In my opinion, I agree that cars which run on natural gas should be prohibited and eventually be replaced by charging vehicles as these are more economical to maintain as well as have a lesser environmental impact.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.528 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06750713121 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3409518834 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227378970405 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852402924416 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653932968024 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155313978399 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509410088474 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.